Categories: General

Decision To Overturn The Crime Of Theft Due To The Lack Of Conclusive And Sufficient Evidence

T.C Supreme Court 2. Department Of The Penal Code No: 2014/30129 Decision No: 2016/9161, D. Date: 12.5.2016

Court :Criminal Court of First Instance
Crime : theft, disturbing housing immunity
Sentencing: conviction
File reviewed and considered necessary;
I – the child who was dragged into the crime … and the defendants … and … in the review of the appeal request for the provisions of the conviction against him;
Defendants ….. and ……. about TCK 53. the decision of the Constitutional Court on the cancellation of some parts of the article entered into force on 24/11/2015 08/10/2015 day and 2014/140 basis, 2015/85 was also taken into consideration in the execution phase of the application of the deprivation of rights provided for in this article.
The hearing, the evidence collected, the reason, the judge’s opinion and discretion in accordance with the request for approval of the provisions with the rejection of the appeal is not in place,
II-in the examination of the appeal against the provisions of the conviction against the accused … and the child who was dragged into the crime … ;
1-in the face of understanding that the defendant …was convicted of another crime around the same jurisdiction on the date of sentencing; without asking whether the defendant wanted to be immune from the trial and without making a decision on this issue, the verdict was announced at the Hearing dated 08/03/2013 by deciding that he was convicted, 5271 CMK 196. restriction of the right to defense in violation of the article,
2 – a child dragged into a crime …in the face of the defense that he did not commit discarded crimes, a child dragged into a crime or other crime … and defendants ….., …… and ……’he had participated in that crime the punishment is sure enough, and convincing evidence the absence of appropriate written obligations of acquittal without considering the law instead of deciding on,
It was unanimously decided on 12/05/2016 that the provisions should be overturned for the reasons described, as the child’s defense and the defendant’s appeals were considered in place in this regard.

Aşıkoğlu Law Office

Recent Posts

A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION UNDER THE WORKPLACE INSURANCE POLICY, WHICH ALSO INCLUDES EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE

17. Law Office 2018/1547 E. , 2018/12611 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

2 years ago

REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE AND DECISION

ARTICLE 402 OF THE CCP (1) The request for the determination of evidence shall be…

2 years ago

DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF HMK

ARTICLE 400 OF THE Civil Procedure Code (1) Each of the Parties may request that…

2 years ago

CHILDREN RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR DEPRIVATION OF SUPPORT DUE TO PARENTS

SUPPORT OF PARENTS TO THEIR CHILDREN 1- GENERAL RULE According to the decisions of the…

2 years ago

COUNCIL OF STATE DECISION ON EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE

11. Apartment 2001/2549 E. , 2005/183 K . “text of jurisprudence” T.C. COUNCIL OF STATE…

2 years ago

COMPENSATION LAWSUIT FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE EARTHQUAKE

17. Law Office 2016/11461 E. , 2019/7615 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

2 years ago