T.C.
Supreme C ourt
8. Criminal Department
Base No:2017/12704
Decision No :2017/14128
Decision Date:12.12.2017
COURT : Criminal Court of First Instance
OFFENSE : Slander
VERDICT : Acquittal
It was discussed and considered as necessary:
In the history of the event when you cut a tree, although she couldn’t see the victims claiming to see when you cut a tree, upon being initiated in response to an investigation into the victims, the defendant’s deliberate slander notice the presence of trees continues to cut the scene because it knows it doesn’t victims, even though the forest had committed the offence of opposition to the law to bet that the TCL charge due to the presence of the realization of the ends, and loaded with felony convictions in terms of the elements instead of written justification for his acquittal decision,
Contrary to the law, since the appeals of the Public Prosecutor have been considered in place as of this date, the provision is therefore 8/1 of the Law No. 5320. CMUK No. 1412, which must be implemented in accordance with its article.No. 321. its DETERIORATION in accordance with the article was decided unanimously on the day of 12.12.2017.
You can read others by clicking here.
17. Law Office 2018/1547 E. , 2018/12611 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…
ARTICLE 402 OF THE CCP (1) The request for the determination of evidence shall be…
ARTICLE 400 OF THE Civil Procedure Code (1) Each of the Parties may request that…
SUPPORT OF PARENTS TO THEIR CHILDREN 1- GENERAL RULE According to the decisions of the…
11. Apartment 2001/2549 E. , 2005/183 K . “text of jurisprudence” T.C. COUNCIL OF STATE…
17. Law Office 2016/11461 E. , 2019/7615 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…