CONTRIBUTE IN CONTINUOUS CRIME - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
19065
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-19065,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

CONTRIBUTE IN CONTINUOUS CRIME

01 Sep CONTRIBUTE IN CONTINUOUS CRIME

Posted at 12:02h in INFORMATION by
0 Likes

In acts processed without interruption, the difference between completion and ending results in terms of attempted. It is possible that the provisions of the enterprise can be applied until they are completed. After completion, however, the execution is continued, but there is no mention of the enterprise as the completion has taken place. Therefore, from this moment on, effective provisions of regret are applied (TCK article 110). Continuous crime also features in terms of participation. Since the single perpetrator system is not accepted in crimes, since the distinction of perpetrator and Sharia is made, participation is possible as long as the crime continues to be committed without interruption, that is, until it is finished. Both until and after the crime is completed
it is possible that joint failure will occur until it is over. Joint perpetrators are not required to continue their actions until the crime is over. If they did not continue their actions after the completion of the crime, joint failure occurred. After the completion of the crime, other persons may participate in the execution of the act as joint perpetrators. Ensuring that the perpetrator who committed the crime without interruption commits the crime again after the interruption will constitute an incentive. Activities to ensure that the perpetrator continues to commit the crime before the interruption occurs will be qualified as part of the assistance,
A legitimate defense against this verb is possible, since there is an attack due to the continuation of the execution of the verb. It is important that the crime is uninterrupted in terms of the place and time of the crime. Further explanations on these issues should be considered the statute of limitations of the case will begin from the date of the deduction.

Tags:
, , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran