27 Oct APPEAL TO THE LEGAL STATUS SUMMARY
TO THE CRIMINAL COURT THE OBJECTOR (CONVICT) : THE DEFENDER : ADDRESS : SUBJECT : It consists of our objection to the statute of limitations. INSTRUCTIONS : 1-) The date of conditional release ...
TO THE CRIMINAL COURT THE OBJECTOR (CONVICT) : THE DEFENDER : ADDRESS : SUBJECT : It consists of our objection to the statute of limitations. INSTRUCTIONS : 1-) The date of conditional release ...
TO THE COURT FILE NO : ...
CIVIL COURT ARBITRATION AT THE DETECTION PROMPT SITUATED : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : address : attorney : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) address : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) OPPONENT : address : SUBJECT : In our client's car ../../…. The determination of the damage caused by the traffic accident that occurred...
TO THE JUDICATURE OF .. COURT DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE THE OBJECTOR : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : address : attorney : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) address : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) OPPONENT : SUBJECT : It consists of our objections to the determination of evidence. INSTRUCTIONS : 1-) The lease agreement signed...
TO THE JUDICATURE OF THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT Prosecutor: TC ID NO / Your Address: Defendant: Case: Issuance of a Certificate of Inheritance Legator:...
TO THE HONORABLE JUDICATURE ……. PLAINTIFF :...
TO THE JUDICATURE OF ...
T.C. SUPREME COURT 20.law office Base: 2016/5753 Decision: 2016/7425 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 CASE OF LABOR RECEIVABLES – THE PLAINTIFF STAYS IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE LABOR COURTS AT THE ADDRESS WHERE HE DOES HIS JOB – THE PLAINTIFF FILES A LAWSUIT IN THE COURT OF THE PLACE WHERE HE...
T.C. SUPREME COURT 19.law office Base: 2016/2068 Decision: 2016/10869 Date of Decision: 16.06.2016 CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – THE COURT'S OBJECTION TO THE AUTHORITY IS NOT HEARABLE – THERE IS NO OBJECTION TO THE AUTHORITY DULY MADE IN THE CASE DURING THE COURSE OF THE CASE - THE...
T.C. SUPREME COURT 3.law office Base : 2016/10495 Decision: 2016/9366 Date of Decision: 16.06.2016 CASE OF COMPENSATION – CLAIMANT'S CLAIM FOR RECEIVABLES BASED ON THE LEGAL REASON OF UNJUSTIFIED ENRICHMENT – DISPUTE RESOLUTION IS THE DUTY OF THE GENERAL COURTS – THE PROVISION IS BROKEN SUMMARY: The plaintiff's request is TMK's.....