INFORMATION

THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION ON WHO OWNS THE BURDEN OF PROOF

T.C SUPREME COURT 9.Legal Department, Base: 2015/34918 Decision: 2019/19490 Decision Date: 11.11.2019 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT TRIBUNAL :EMPLOYMENT…

3 years ago

EXCLUSION FROM PARTNERSHIP IN LIMITED COMPANIES

EXCLUSION FROM PARTNERSHIP IN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES In this article, the rules and principles related to the institution of exclusion…

3 years ago

EXCLUSION FROM THE PARTNERSHIP ON THE BASIS OF THE REASONS PROVIDED FOR IN THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

It is possible to exclude a partner from the partnership on the basis of the reasons provided for in the…

3 years ago

EXCLUSION FROM THE PARTNERSHIP BASED ON A JUSTIFIED REASON

Exclusion from the Partnership Based on a Justified Reason Another way to remove a partner from a partnership in limited…

3 years ago

MERGER, UNLAWFUL USE OF DOMINANCE AND EXCLUSION FROM THE PARTNERSHIP ON THE BASIS OF NON-PERFORMANCE OF CAPITAL DEBT

Merger, Unlawful Use of Dominance and Exclusion from the Partnership on the Basis of Non-Performance of Capital Debt The TCC…

3 years ago

WHAT IS THE CASH IN HAND BECAUSE OF LEAVING

In the event that a limited liability company partner is excluded from the partnership, TCC has made it a provision…

3 years ago

CAN THE EMPLOYEE WITHSTAND THEM IF HE CANNOT PROVE THE INSULT, BUT THERE ARE OTHER JUSTIFIABLE REASONS FOR TERMINATION?

Although workers face insults many times in their working lives, they may have problems proving this situation. Here is a…

3 years ago

IS THERE A LEGAL REGULATION TO PROTECT THE EMPLOYEE WHO HAS BEEN INSULTED BY THE EMPLOYER?

Regulation on the subject 4857 p. It is introduced in Article 24/II-b of the Labor Code. According to this; “…

3 years ago

PLAINTIFF COULD NOT PROVE WITH CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE HE HAD PAID THE AMOUNT DUE UNDER THE CONTRACT

T.C SUPREME COURT 13.Legal Department, Base: 2016/ 12625 Decision: 2019 / 6317 Decision Date: 20.05.2019 SUMMARY: By the court, the…

3 years ago