General

AFTER EXPRESSING AN OPINION ON THE REJECTION OF THE REQUEST BY THE REJECTED JUDGE, IT WAS DECIDED THAT THE REJECTION REQUEST SHOULD BE REJECTED BY THE AUTHORITY EXAMINING THE FILE AND THE DEFENDANT SHOULD BE PUNISHED WITH A DISCIPLINARY FINE

T.C. SUPREME COURT 20.law office Main: 2016/8402 Decision: 2016/7559 Date of Decision: 13.07.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – UPON EXPRESSING AN OPINION…

3 years ago

THE REASONS PUT FORWARD FOR THE REFUSAL OF THE JUDGE ARE THE REASON FOR THE APPEAL FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE MERITS OF THE WORK

T.C. SUPREME COURT 20.law office Main: 2016/8414 Decision: 2016/7571 Date of Decision: 13.07.2016 CASE OF COMPENSATION – REFUSAL OF WHICH…

3 years ago

IN A CLEAR AND INCOMPREHENSIBLE STATEMENT, BASED ON THE AMOUNTS SPECIFIED FROM EACH DEFENDANT’S POINT OF VIEW, IT IS INCORRECT TO ESTABLISH A PROVISION IN THE FORM OF JOINT RECEIPT FROM THE DEFENDANTS AND DELIVERY TO THE PLAINTIFF

11.law office Base: 2016/4219 Decision: 2016/6890 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 A REQUEST TO COLLECT CORPORATE DAMAGES – IN THE FORM…

3 years ago

IN ORDER FOR AN APPEAL REVIEW TO BE CONDUCTED, THE VALUE OF THE GOODS OR RIGHTS THAT THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT JUL WILL NOT EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT – THE VALUE OF THE OFFENDING GOODS REMAINS BELOW THE APPEAL LIMIT

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/10162 Decision: 2016/10473 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 THE CASE ARISING FROM FORECLOSURE – THE…

3 years ago

THE VALUE OF THE ATTATCHED PROPERTIES’ ARE BELOW THE LEGAL LIMIT

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/9792 Decision: 2016/10477 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 THE CASE OF THE RATION - WHERE…

3 years ago

IN ORDER FOR THE FOLLOW-UP OF RECOVERY CASES TO BE CARRIED OUT IN ORDER FOR THE APPEAL REVIEW TO BE MADE IN THE ABETEMENT DECISIONS, THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR THE RIGHT THAT THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT CARRIES OUT MUST EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/9690 Decision: 2016/10437 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 FORTIFICATION CASE – THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE…

3 years ago

IT IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE START DATE OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AS OF THE DATE OF THE PLAINTIFF’S LOSS

T.C. SUPREME COURT 4.law office Base: 2016/3774 Decision: 2016/7793 Date of Decision: 13.06.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – IT IS NECESSARY TO…

3 years ago

THE EXECUTIVE COURT’S DECISION STIPULATES THAT THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR RIGHT OF INTEREST MUST EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base : 2014/21867 Decision: 2016/10043 Date of Decision: 08.06.2016 FORTIFICATION CASE – WHERE THE VALUE…

3 years ago

SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION OF TITLE DEEDS

T.C. SUPREME COURT 1.law office Base: 2014/16696 Decision: 2016/5804 Date of Decision: 10.09.2016 CASE OF CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION OF TITLE…

3 years ago

THE SUPERIOR COURT DECISION FOR CRIME OF MISUSE OF CREDIT CARDS

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.Criminal Department Base: 2016/6199 Decision: 2016/8684 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 CRIME OF MISUSE OF CREDIT CARDS –…

3 years ago
Show more Posts
Show previous Posts