General

THE OWNER OF THE REGISTRATION OF THE VEHICLE USED IN THE CRIME WAS INFORMED OF THE CASE AND RULED BY INCOMPLETE EXAMINATION WITHOUT RECEIVING A DECLARATION ON CONFISCATION

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 7.Criminal Department Base: 2014/30174 Decision: 2016/9031 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 CRIME OF OPPOSITION TO LAW NO.…

3 years ago

A SUMMARY OF THE ACCOUNT BELONGING TO THE CREDIT CARD SHOULD BE BROUGHT AND IT SHOULD BE DETERMINED WHETHER IT WAS USED ON THE DATE OF THE INCIDENT AND A PROVISION SHOULD BE MADE ACCORDING TO THE RESULT

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 8.Criminal Department Base: 2016/6199 Decision: 2016/8684 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 CRIME OF MISUSE OF CREDIT CARDS…

3 years ago

IN THE PROVISION ESTABLISHED ABOUT THE DEFENDANT, AN INCREASE IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ARTICLE OF THE Turkish Civil Code , WHILE THE RESULT IS THAT AN EXCESSIVE PENALTY IS ASSIGNED BY INCORRECTLY CALCULATING THE PENALTY

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 3.Criminal Department Base: 2016/238 Decision: 2016/15323 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 OFFENSE OF WOUNDING – THE PROVISION…

3 years ago

SEIZURE OF UNLABELED AND ILLEGAL CIGARETTES DURING THE SEARCH OF A STOPPED VEHICLE AT ROAD CONTROL

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 7.Criminal Department Based on: 2016/10029 Decision: 2016/8897 Date of Decision: 23.06.2016 A CRIME OF SMUGGLING –…

3 years ago

WHILE IT IS NECESSARY TO BE SATISFIED WITH THE DECISION TO CONFISCATE ILLEGAL GOODS SUBJECT TO CRIME, IT IS ALSO DECIDED TO DISPOSE OF THEM BY DESTRUCTION

T.C. SUPREME COURT 7.Criminal Department Based on: 2014/28897 Decision: 2016/8781 Date of Decision: 23.06.2016 CRIME OF OPPOSITION TO LAW NO.…

3 years ago

THE SUBJECT OF THE APPEAL REVIEW IS THAT IT SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED WHETHER THERE IS A LINK BETWEEN THIS FILE AND THE OTHER FILE IN TERMS OF DECRIMINALIZATION OF CHAINING

T.C. SUPREME COURT 7.Criminal Department Based on: 2014/24599 Decision: 2016/8643 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 VIOLATION OF LAW NO. 4733 -…

3 years ago

LAWYERS DO NOT HAND OVER THE MONEY THEY COLLECT OR RECEIVE TO THEIR CLIENT WHO OWNS THE BUSINESS AND ACQUIRE THE GOODS

T.C. SUPREME COURT 5.Criminal Department Based on: 2015/11443 Decision: 2016/352 Date of Decision: 14.01.2016 CRIME OF ABUSE OF TRUST DUE…

3 years ago

A DECISION SHOULD BE MADE ACCORDING TO THE RESULT OF EVALUATING THE EXPERT REPORT RECEIVED THAT THE COMPLAINANT WILL RECEIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DECISION ON THE VIOLATION

T.C. SUPREME COURT 23.law office Main: 2014/8017 Decision: 2015/2377 Date of Decision: 09.04.2015 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DECISION TO CANCEL…

3 years ago

THE PLAINTIFF IS FOUND TO BE UNFAIR DUE TO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SHOWN VALUE OF THE REAL ESTATE AND THE ACTUAL VALUE AND THE POWER OF ATTORNEY FEE WILL NOT REQUIRE DECISIVENESS

T.C. SUPREME COURT 1.law office Main: 2014/200 Decision: 2014/12761 Date of Decision: 02.07.2014 TITLE CANCELLATION REGISTRATION AND COMPENSATION CASE –…

3 years ago

ACCORDING TO THE FACT THAT THE DEFENDANTS IN THE MERGED CASE ACCEPTED THE CASE AT THE FIRST HEARING WHERE THEY REPRESENTED THEMSELVES BY PROXY, IN THE ORIGINAL AND MERGED CASE, THE PROXY FEE MUST BE DIVIDED INTO TWO

T.C. SUPREME COURT 1.law office Based on: 2013/18150 Decision: 2014/4386 Date of Decision: 26.02.2014 ACCORDING TO THE FACT THAT THE…

3 years ago
Show more Posts
Show previous Posts