General

REQUEST FOR SEARCH AND SEIZURE

... TO THE JUDICATURE OF THE CRIMINAL COURT OF MAGISTRATES File No : .../... D. labor WHO MADE THE REQUEST…

3 years ago

DECISION ABOUT MAKING A WRITTEN SEARCH WARRANT

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY …….. OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR NUMBER : .... / Muh. SUBJECT : It is about making a…

3 years ago

ARTICLE 151 OF THE TURKISH CRIMINAL CODE NO. 5237 OF 26/9/2004. THE PHRASE “…THE OWNER …” CONTAINED IN PARAGRAPH (2) OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONSTITUTION., 10. AND 90. IT IS A REQUEST TO DECIDE ON ITS CANCELLATION BY CLAIMING THAT IT IS CONTRARY TO THE ARTICLES.

THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Base Date : 2018/6 Decision Number : 2021/60 Date of Decision : 22/9/2021 Official…

3 years ago

THE ACCUSED DID NOT HAVE ANY ACTIONS THAT WOULD CONSTITUTE CHEATING – THE WRONGFUL PAYMENT MADE BY THE INSTITUTION WAS REIMBURSED BY THE DEFENDANTS TOGETHER WITH THEIR INTEREST – THE ELEMENTS OF THE CHARGED CRIME WERE NOT FORMED

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 23.Criminal Department Base: 2015/11475 Decision: 2016/5775 Date of Decision: 04.05.2016 QUALIFIED FRAUD OFFENCE…

3 years ago

WHETHER THE CASE CARRIES AN ELEMENT OF FOREIGNESS– THE NEED TO EXAMINE THE MERITS OF THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH TURKISH LAW

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 2.law office Base: 2015/13927 Decision: 2016/5499 Date of Decision: 21.03.2016 DIVORCE CASE –…

3 years ago

IF THERE IS REAL ESTATE BELONGING TO THE DECEASED, THE LAND REGISTRY AND THE BASIS DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE BROUGHT AND IT SHOULD BE DETERMINED WHO THE HEIRS OF THE DECEASED ARE ACTUALLY

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 14.law office Base: 2015/12867 Decision: 2016/2952 Date of Decision: 08.03.2016 CASE OF CANCELLATION…

3 years ago

THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE HEIRS OF THE DECEASED’S AND THEIR SHARE OF INHERITANCE

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 14.law office Base: 2015/16277 Decision: 2016/2733 Date of Decision: 03.03.2016 REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A…

3 years ago

DECEASED’S POPULATION REGISTRATION INFORMATION AND ADDRESS HAVE NOT BEEN INVESTIGATED THESE ISSUES HAVE NOT BEEN ASKED BY THE LAND REGISTRY OFFICE

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 14.law office Base: 2015/12937 Decision: 2016/2555 Date of Decision: 01.03.2016 REQUEST TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF…

3 years ago

THE INADMISSIBILITY OF DECIDING ON THE CONVICTION OF THE ACCUSED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE FACT THAT HIS ACT FALLS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF USELESS FORGERY AND DOES NOT OCCUR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE BREAKTHROUGH CRIME

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 21.Criminal Department Base: 2015/5637 Decision: 2016/1463 Date of Decision: 18.02.2016 FORGERY OFFENCE – THE INADMISSIBILITY OF…

3 years ago

AS A RESULT OF AN ACCOUNT ERROR, IT WAS DECIDED TO COLLECT THE FEE FROM THE DEFENDANT – THE REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF THE DECISION WAS CONSIDERED ON THE SPOT IN THIS DIRECTION AND THE CORRECTION OF THE MATERIAL ERROR WAS ACCEPTED

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 15.law office Base: 2016/577 Decision: 2016/3867 Date of Decision: 14.07.2016 THE CASE ARISING FROM THE WORK…

3 years ago
Show more Posts
Show previous Posts