Categories: General

Cancellation of The Title Due To Collusion

T.C SUPREME COURT 1.Legal Department Basis: 2019 / 3518 Decision: 2020 / 762 Decision Date: 10.02.2020

SUPREME COURT DECISION

COURT: … DISTRICT COURT 1. LEGAL DEPARTMENT

CASE TYPE :

LAND>

CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION

In the case considered by combining between the parties;

In the original and combined case, the plaintiffs, the heirs … and …the subject of the case in which they are stakeholders 1753 Island 1 is assigned by sale to the defendant …who is the Sons of the independent Section 2 contained in the parcel, the assignment is for the purpose of kidnapping property from the heirs, free of charge and

by claiming that they were collusive

Land Registry

with the cancellation, they asked for registration in their names at the rate of inheritance shares.

The defendant took care of his bedridden heirs ‘parents, made many expenses as treatment expenses, paid his heirs’ father’s debts to the environment, when he could not afford the treatment costs

muris defended the dismissal of the case, stating that his father wanted the real estate to be sold, so he bought the real estate, the sale was real.

By the Court of First Instance

it was decided to dismiss the case on the grounds that it was not muvazaali; the application for the application of the attorney of the plaintiffs …District Court 1. 353/1 of HMK No. 6100 by the legal department.b.It was essentially rejected in accordance with Article 1.

The decision was appealed by the counsel of the plaintiffs, but the judge’s report was read and received. The case has been reviewed, discussed and considered.

-DECISION-

According to the content of the file, the evidence collected, the legal and legal justification on which the provision is based, and in particular the lack of accuracy in the evaluation of the evidence; the refusal of the plaintiffs ‘ appeal, which is not in place, and the approval of the provision in accordance with the procedure and law, written below 10.00. It was unanimously decided on 10.02.2020 that the TL balance approval fee should be taken from the appellant plaintiffs.

Aşıkoğlu Law Office

Recent Posts

A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION UNDER THE WORKPLACE INSURANCE POLICY, WHICH ALSO INCLUDES EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE

17. Law Office 2018/1547 E. , 2018/12611 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

1 year ago

REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE AND DECISION

ARTICLE 402 OF THE CCP (1) The request for the determination of evidence shall be…

1 year ago

DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF HMK

ARTICLE 400 OF THE Civil Procedure Code (1) Each of the Parties may request that…

1 year ago

CHILDREN RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR DEPRIVATION OF SUPPORT DUE TO PARENTS

SUPPORT OF PARENTS TO THEIR CHILDREN 1- GENERAL RULE According to the decisions of the…

1 year ago

COUNCIL OF STATE DECISION ON EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE

11. Apartment 2001/2549 E. , 2005/183 K . “text of jurisprudence” T.C. COUNCIL OF STATE…

1 year ago

COMPENSATION LAWSUIT FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE EARTHQUAKE

17. Law Office 2016/11461 E. , 2019/7615 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

1 year ago