Burden of Proof - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
18966
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-18966,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Burden of Proof

20 Aug Burden of Proof

Posted at 14:47h in INFORMATION by
0 Likes

6 Of The Turkish Civil Code. according to Article 190 of the Code of civil procedure, ” unless there is a provision to the contrary in the law, each party is obliged to prove the existence of the facts on which it bases”. according to the article, “the burden of proof belongs to the party that claims in its favor from the legal outcome connected to the case, unless there is a special regulation in the law.” says.

Exceptions provided for by law are liability for defects, both from torts and from separation into debt. In both cases, the basic condition of compensation is that the wrongdoer or debtor is defective. In this case, the party damaged by the unjust action of another is obliged to prove not only that it was unlawfully damaged, but that the defendant’s action against it was flawed. When that happens, the court can rule on compensation.

Tags:
, , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran