Workers may have problems with proof of this, although many times in their lives they are insulted. An employee in this situation can also rely on them in the notice of termination if they have other justifiable reasons. But it should also and clearly indicate these reasons in the notice of termination. Otherwise, the Supreme Court does not accept that it is based on the reasons for termination that will be revealed later in accordance with the” principle of commitment due to termination”.
Supreme Court 7. “The court has decided to accept severance pay by stating that the plaintiff’s mobbing and defamation claims cannot be proven, but that the termination of the employment contract due to non-payment of overtime pay is also a justifiable reason. The plaintiff is bound by the reason of termination and cannot change it later. In no way did the plaintiff specify the non-payment of Labor receivables as the reason for termination in the notice of termination and also could not prove the issues he stated as the reason for termination, as the court agreed. In addition, the defendant reported that the plaintiff’s response to the notice of termination notice had been mobbing him in the notice and that the person he had threatened to fire had no authority to do so. Since the plaintiff is bound by the reason of termination and cannot change it, the request for severance pay should be rejected, while its acceptance on a different basis was erroneous and required to be overturned. “he made an assessment in the form